首页> 外文OA文献 >Second-chance punitivism and the contractual governance of crime and incivility: New Labour, old Hobbes
【2h】

Second-chance punitivism and the contractual governance of crime and incivility: New Labour, old Hobbes

机译:第二次机会的惩罚主义和犯罪与不文明的契约治理:新工党,老霍布斯

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The growing application of mechanisms of contractual governance to behaviour that breaches social norms, rather than the criminal law, appears to represent an ethopolitical concern with delinquent self-reform through the activation of technologies of the self. In fact, there is little empirical evidence that the contractual governance of incivility leads to such self-reform. Beneath the ideology of contractual agreement to observe social norms lies what this paper calls a ‘second-chance punitivism’ which operates to crystallise behavioural elements of the Hobbesian social contract, after breach, into a more specific form. The responsibilising and individualising properties of this form of contractual governance set the moral-ideological platform for a retributive punitivism, when the rational agents it creates fail to live up to their image, and are taken to have wasted their ‘second chance’.
机译:契约治理机制越来越多地应用于违反社会规范而不是刑法的行为,这似乎代表着一种通过激活自我技术来进行自我改造的伦理政治问题。实际上,几乎没有经验证据表明合同制的不活跃导致这种自我改革。在合同约定的遵守社会规范的意识形态下,存在本文称为“第二次机会惩罚主义”的行为,该行为将霍布斯式社会契约的行为要素在违约后具体化为更具体的形式。这种合同治理形式的责任感和个性化特性为报应性惩罚主义奠定了道德思想平台,当它所创造的理性行为者不辜负自己的形象,并被认为浪费了他们的“第二次机会”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mackenzie, S.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号